打印

[德國] 英冠+葡超 波膽 2 x 3 x 雲達不來梅

 
收藏  |  訂閱
21  601

英冠+葡超 波膽 2 x 3 x 雲達不來梅

Who cares about 1860 Munich?

Go for another set of correct score again.

2x3 波膽 x 雲達不來梅 (At least you will not lose... sporting is got to be 0:1 or 0:2)

星期五 5
般尼(主) 對 普雷斯頓(客)
0:[email protected]
0:[email protected]

星期五 6
比拉馬(主) 對 士砵亭(客)
0:[email protected]
0:[email protected]

星期五 4
緬恩斯(主) 對 雲達不來梅(客)
客@1.42
$ 10.00


星期五 1 奧格斯堡 (主) 對 1860慕尼黑 (客)
0:1 @ 6.50
0:2 @ 9.00
1:2 @ 9.00 $10

星期五 2 布倫瑞克 (主) 對 格雷特霍夫 (客)
0:1 @ 7.50
0:2 @ 10.00
0:3 @ 24.00 $10

2x3 波膽
Total cost: $150

[ 本帖最後由 princessnqueen 於 2006-10-28 02:22 AM 編輯 ]

i bet 1860慕尼黑 w, good luck & win together~~

引用:
原帖由 waves369 於 2006-10-27 11:46 PM 發表
i bet 1860慕尼黑 w, good luck & win together~~
thx and i hope so :014:

引用:
原帖由 princessnqueen 於 2006-10-27 11:34 PM 發表
星期五 1 奧格斯堡 (主) 對 1860慕尼黑 (客)
0:1 @ 6.50
0:2 @ 9.00
1:2 @ 9.00 $10

星期五 2 布倫瑞克 (主) 對 格雷特霍夫 (客)
0:1 @ 7.50
0:2 @ 10.00
0:3 @ 24.00 $10

2x3 波膽
Total cost: $150
Well, only lost $50... however it'll be different if 1860 wasn't that kind of perforance they were tonight... :022:

引用:
原帖由 princessnqueen 於 2006-10-28 01:53 AM 發表


Well, only lost $50... however it'll be different if 1860 wasn't that kind of perforance they were tonight... :022:
agree, 1860 made me very disapointted ~~

引用:
原帖由 waves369 於 2006-10-28 02:04 AM 發表


agree, 1860 made me very disapointted ~~
yeah... chance for me to win 600 - 900, but... :022:

well thinking about how to bet on correct score for Bremen / Preston / Sporting right now...

Who cares about 1860 Munich?

Go for another set of correct score again.

2x3 波膽 x 雲達不來梅 (At least you will not lose... sporting is got to be 0:1 or 0:2)

星期五 5
般尼(主) 對 普雷斯頓(客)
0:[email protected]
0:[email protected]

星期五 6
比拉馬(主) 對 士砵亭(客)
0:[email protected]
0:[email protected]

星期五 4
緬恩斯(主) 對 雲達不來梅(客)
客@1.42
$ 10.00

Total cost: $80

Bremen 1-0, Klose scores..............

引用:
原帖由 princessnqueen 於 2006-10-28 02:44 AM 發表
Bremen 1-0, Klose scores..............
無留力買大同大比數波膽就岩:014:

3-0 Bremen... tried to update 2-0, but it's just too fast

前往最後回覆